wxuande 2019-06-28
对于多进程多线程的应用程序来说,保证数据正确的同步与更新离不开锁和信号,swoole
中的锁与信号基本采用 pthread
系列函数实现。UNIX
中的锁类型有很多种:互斥锁、自旋锁、文件锁、读写锁、原子锁,本节就会讲解 swoole
中各种锁的定义与使用。
swoole
中无论哪种锁,其数据结构都是 swLock
,这个数据结构内部有一个联合体 object
,这个联合体可以是 互斥锁、自旋锁、文件锁、读写锁、原子锁,type
可以指代这个锁的类型,具体可选项是 SW_LOCKS
这个枚举类型lock_rd
和 trylock_rd
两个函数是专门为了 swFileLock
和 swRWLock
设计的,其他锁没有这两个函数。typedef struct _swLock { int type; union { swMutex mutex; #ifdef HAVE_RWLOCK swRWLock rwlock; #endif #ifdef HAVE_SPINLOCK swSpinLock spinlock; #endif swFileLock filelock; swSem sem; swAtomicLock atomlock; } object; int (*lock_rd)(struct _swLock *); int (*lock)(struct _swLock *); int (*unlock)(struct _swLock *); int (*trylock_rd)(struct _swLock *); int (*trylock)(struct _swLock *); int (*free)(struct _swLock *); } swLock; enum SW_LOCKS { SW_RWLOCK = 1, #define SW_RWLOCK SW_RWLOCK SW_FILELOCK = 2, #define SW_FILELOCK SW_FILELOCK SW_MUTEX = 3, #define SW_MUTEX SW_MUTEX SW_SEM = 4, #define SW_SEM SW_SEM SW_SPINLOCK = 5, #define SW_SPINLOCK SW_SPINLOCK SW_ATOMLOCK = 6, #define SW_ATOMLOCK SW_ATOMLOCK };
互斥锁是最常用的进程/线程锁,swMutex
的基础是 pthread_mutex
系列函数, 因此该数据结构只有两个成员变量:_lock
、attr
:
typedef struct _swMutex { pthread_mutex_t _lock; pthread_mutexattr_t attr; } swMutex;
互斥锁的创建就是 pthread_mutex
互斥锁的初始化,首先初始化互斥锁的属性 pthread_mutexattr_t attr
,设定互斥锁是否要进程共享,之后设置各个关于锁的函数:
int swMutex_create(swLock *lock, int use_in_process) { int ret; bzero(lock, sizeof(swLock)); lock->type = SW_MUTEX; pthread_mutexattr_init(&lock->object.mutex.attr); if (use_in_process == 1) { pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&lock->object.mutex.attr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED); } if ((ret = pthread_mutex_init(&lock->object.mutex._lock, &lock->object.mutex.attr)) < 0) { return SW_ERR; } lock->lock = swMutex_lock; lock->unlock = swMutex_unlock; lock->trylock = swMutex_trylock; lock->free = swMutex_free; return SW_OK; }
互斥锁的函数就是调用相应的 pthread_mutex
系列函数:
static int swMutex_lock(swLock *lock) { return pthread_mutex_lock(&lock->object.mutex._lock); } static int swMutex_unlock(swLock *lock) { return pthread_mutex_unlock(&lock->object.mutex._lock); } static int swMutex_trylock(swLock *lock) { return pthread_mutex_trylock(&lock->object.mutex._lock); } static int swMutex_free(swLock *lock) { pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&lock->object.mutex.attr); return pthread_mutex_destroy(&lock->object.mutex._lock); } int swMutex_lockwait(swLock *lock, int timeout_msec) { struct timespec timeo; timeo.tv_sec = timeout_msec / 1000; timeo.tv_nsec = (timeout_msec - timeo.tv_sec * 1000) * 1000 * 1000; return pthread_mutex_timedlock(&lock->object.mutex._lock, &timeo); }
对于读多写少的情况,读写锁可以显著的提高程序效率,swRWLock
的基础是 pthread_rwlock
系列函数:
typedef struct _swRWLock { pthread_rwlock_t _lock; pthread_rwlockattr_t attr; } swRWLock;
读写锁的创建过程和互斥锁类似:
int swRWLock_create(swLock *lock, int use_in_process) { int ret; bzero(lock, sizeof(swLock)); lock->type = SW_RWLOCK; pthread_rwlockattr_init(&lock->object.rwlock.attr); if (use_in_process == 1) { pthread_rwlockattr_setpshared(&lock->object.rwlock.attr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED); } if ((ret = pthread_rwlock_init(&lock->object.rwlock._lock, &lock->object.rwlock.attr)) < 0) { return SW_ERR; } lock->lock_rd = swRWLock_lock_rd; lock->lock = swRWLock_lock_rw; lock->unlock = swRWLock_unlock; lock->trylock = swRWLock_trylock_rw; lock->trylock_rd = swRWLock_trylock_rd; lock->free = swRWLock_free; return SW_OK; }
static int swRWLock_lock_rd(swLock *lock) { return pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&lock->object.rwlock._lock); } static int swRWLock_lock_rw(swLock *lock) { return pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&lock->object.rwlock._lock); } static int swRWLock_unlock(swLock *lock) { return pthread_rwlock_unlock(&lock->object.rwlock._lock); } static int swRWLock_trylock_rd(swLock *lock) { return pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(&lock->object.rwlock._lock); } static int swRWLock_trylock_rw(swLock *lock) { return pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(&lock->object.rwlock._lock); } static int swRWLock_free(swLock *lock) { return pthread_rwlock_destroy(&lock->object.rwlock._lock); }
文件锁是对多进程、多线程同一时间写相同文件这一场景设定的锁,底层函数是 fcntl
:
typedef struct _swFileLock { struct flock lock_t; int fd; } swFileLock;
int swFileLock_create(swLock *lock, int fd) { bzero(lock, sizeof(swLock)); lock->type = SW_FILELOCK; lock->object.filelock.fd = fd; lock->lock_rd = swFileLock_lock_rd; lock->lock = swFileLock_lock_rw; lock->trylock_rd = swFileLock_trylock_rd; lock->trylock = swFileLock_trylock_rw; lock->unlock = swFileLock_unlock; lock->free = swFileLock_free; return 0; }
static int swFileLock_lock_rd(swLock *lock) { lock->object.filelock.lock_t.l_type = F_RDLCK; return fcntl(lock->object.filelock.fd, F_SETLKW, &lock->object.filelock); } static int swFileLock_lock_rw(swLock *lock) { lock->object.filelock.lock_t.l_type = F_WRLCK; return fcntl(lock->object.filelock.fd, F_SETLKW, &lock->object.filelock); } static int swFileLock_unlock(swLock *lock) { lock->object.filelock.lock_t.l_type = F_UNLCK; return fcntl(lock->object.filelock.fd, F_SETLKW, &lock->object.filelock); } static int swFileLock_trylock_rw(swLock *lock) { lock->object.filelock.lock_t.l_type = F_WRLCK; return fcntl(lock->object.filelock.fd, F_SETLK, &lock->object.filelock); } static int swFileLock_trylock_rd(swLock *lock) { lock->object.filelock.lock_t.l_type = F_RDLCK; return fcntl(lock->object.filelock.fd, F_SETLK, &lock->object.filelock); } static int swFileLock_free(swLock *lock) { return close(lock->object.filelock.fd); }
自旋锁类似于互斥锁,不同的是自旋锁在加锁失败的时候,并不会沉入内核,而是空转,这样的锁效率更高,但是会空耗 CPU
资源:
typedef struct _swSpinLock { pthread_spinlock_t lock_t; } swSpinLock;
int swSpinLock_create(swLock *lock, int use_in_process) { int ret; bzero(lock, sizeof(swLock)); lock->type = SW_SPINLOCK; if ((ret = pthread_spin_init(&lock->object.spinlock.lock_t, use_in_process)) < 0) { return -1; } lock->lock = swSpinLock_lock; lock->unlock = swSpinLock_unlock; lock->trylock = swSpinLock_trylock; lock->free = swSpinLock_free; return 0; }
static int swSpinLock_lock(swLock *lock) { return pthread_spin_lock(&lock->object.spinlock.lock_t); } static int swSpinLock_unlock(swLock *lock) { return pthread_spin_unlock(&lock->object.spinlock.lock_t); } static int swSpinLock_trylock(swLock *lock) { return pthread_spin_trylock(&lock->object.spinlock.lock_t); } static int swSpinLock_free(swLock *lock) { return pthread_spin_destroy(&lock->object.spinlock.lock_t); }
不同于以上几种锁,swoole
的原子锁并不是 pthread
系列的锁,而是自定义实现的。
typedef volatile uint32_t sw_atomic_uint32_t; typedef sw_atomic_uint32_t sw_atomic_t; typedef struct _swAtomicLock { sw_atomic_t lock_t; uint32_t spin; } swAtomicLock;
int swAtomicLock_create(swLock *lock, int spin) { bzero(lock, sizeof(swLock)); lock->type = SW_ATOMLOCK; lock->object.atomlock.spin = spin; lock->lock = swAtomicLock_lock; lock->unlock = swAtomicLock_unlock; lock->trylock = swAtomicLock_trylock; return SW_OK; }
static int swAtomicLock_lock(swLock *lock) { sw_spinlock(&lock->object.atomlock.lock_t); return SW_OK; }
原子锁的加锁逻辑函数 sw_spinlock
非常复杂,具体步骤如下:
sw_atomic_cmp_set
(__sync_bool_compare_and_swap
) 进行加锁sched_yield
函数让出执行权,因为这说明自旋锁已经被其他进程加锁,但是却被强占睡眠,我们需要让出控制权让那个唯一的 cpu
把那个进程跑下去,注意这时绝对不能进行自选,否则就是死锁。sw_atomic_cpu_pause
使用的是内嵌的汇编代码,目的在让 cpu
空转,禁止线程或进程被其他线程强占导致睡眠,恢复上下文浪费时间。SW_SPINLOCK_LOOP_N
次数,还没有能够获取的到锁,那么也要让出控制权,这时很有可能被锁保护的代码有阻塞行为#define sw_atomic_cmp_set(lock, old, set) __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(lock, old, set) #define sw_atomic_cpu_pause() __asm__ __volatile__ ("pause") #define swYield() sched_yield() //or usleep(1) static sw_inline void sw_spinlock(sw_atomic_t *lock) { uint32_t i, n; while (1) { if (*lock == 0 && sw_atomic_cmp_set(lock, 0, 1)) { return; } if (SW_CPU_NUM > 1) { for (n = 1; n < SW_SPINLOCK_LOOP_N; n <<= 1) { for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { sw_atomic_cpu_pause(); } if (*lock == 0 && sw_atomic_cmp_set(lock, 0, 1)) { return; } } } swYield(); } }
static int swAtomicLock_unlock(swLock *lock) { return lock->object.atomlock.lock_t = 0; } static int swAtomicLock_trylock(swLock *lock) { sw_atomic_t *atomic = &lock->object.atomlock.lock_t; return (*(atomic) == 0 && sw_atomic_cmp_set(atomic, 0, 1)); }
信号量也是数据同步的一种重要方式,其数据结构为:
typedef struct _swSem { key_t key; int semid; } swSem;
semget
创建一个新的信号量semctl
会将信号量初始化为 0int swSem_create(swLock *lock, key_t key) { int ret; lock->type = SW_SEM; if ((ret = semget(key, 1, IPC_CREAT | 0666)) < 0) { return SW_ERR; } if (semctl(ret, 0, SETVAL, 1) == -1) { swWarn("semctl(SETVAL) failed"); return SW_ERR; } lock->object.sem.semid = ret; lock->lock = swSem_lock; lock->unlock = swSem_unlock; lock->free = swSem_free; return SW_OK; }
static int swSem_unlock(swLock *lock) { struct sembuf sem; sem.sem_flg = SEM_UNDO; sem.sem_num = 0; sem.sem_op = 1; return semop(lock->object.sem.semid, &sem, 1); }
static int swSem_lock(swLock *lock) { struct sembuf sem; sem.sem_flg = SEM_UNDO; sem.sem_num = 0; sem.sem_op = -1; return semop(lock->object.sem.semid, &sem, 1); }
IPC_RMID
用于销毁信号量static int swSem_free(swLock *lock) { return semctl(lock->object.sem.semid, 0, IPC_RMID); }
swLock
的一员,而是自成一体pthread_cond_t
,还需要互斥量 swLock
typedef struct _swCond { swLock _lock; pthread_cond_t _cond; int (*wait)(struct _swCond *object); int (*timewait)(struct _swCond *object, long, long); int (*notify)(struct _swCond *object); int (*broadcast)(struct _swCond *object); void (*free)(struct _swCond *object); int (*lock)(struct _swCond *object); int (*unlock)(struct _swCond *object); } swCond;
int swCond_create(swCond *cond) { if (pthread_cond_init(&cond->_cond, NULL) < 0) { swWarn("pthread_cond_init fail. Error: %s [%d]", strerror(errno), errno); return SW_ERR; } if (swMutex_create(&cond->_lock, 0) < 0) { return SW_ERR; } cond->notify = swCond_notify; cond->broadcast = swCond_broadcast; cond->timewait = swCond_timewait; cond->wait = swCond_wait; cond->lock = swCond_lock; cond->unlock = swCond_unlock; cond->free = swCond_free; return SW_OK; }
swCond_lock
、swCond_unlock
等函数static int swCond_notify(swCond *cond) { return pthread_cond_signal(&cond->_cond); } static int swCond_broadcast(swCond *cond) { return pthread_cond_broadcast(&cond->_cond); } static int swCond_timewait(swCond *cond, long sec, long nsec) { struct timespec timeo; timeo.tv_sec = sec; timeo.tv_nsec = nsec; return pthread_cond_timedwait(&cond->_cond, &cond->_lock.object.mutex._lock, &timeo); } static int swCond_wait(swCond *cond) { return pthread_cond_wait(&cond->_cond, &cond->_lock.object.mutex._lock); } static int swCond_lock(swCond *cond) { return cond->_lock.lock(&cond->_lock); } static int swCond_unlock(swCond *cond) { return cond->_lock.unlock(&cond->_lock); } static void swCond_free(swCond *cond) { pthread_cond_destroy(&cond->_cond); cond->_lock.free(&cond->_lock); }